AMD Ryzen R5 2500U is Ryzen’s newly released processor this year. The recently released Lenovo ideapad 720S is equipped with this processor for the first time. So, how is the performance of this AMD Ryzen R5 2500U processor? Here for everyone Introduce.
In terms of CPU
The Ryzen architecture Ryzen CPU is fully capable of competing head-on with Intel's eighth-generation Core on the notebook platform. With the same frequency and the same number of cores, there is no significant difference in performance between AMD CPUs and Intel CPUs. Low-voltage thin and light notebooks only increase the constraints on power consumption and heat dissipation bottlenecks, and will not change the architectural essence of the two. Intel is currently relatively sensitive in its frequency adjustment mechanism, but AMD can control the frequency unit more accurately.
GPU aspect
Perhaps the Vega GPU can give full play to its advantages under more abundant TDP and heat dissipation conditions, but in thin and light notebooks, at least Lenovo ideapad Among thin and light platforms that are positioned at the mainstream level and have a large shipment volume, although Vega GPU surpasses Intel core graphics, it does not yet have the ability to compete head-on with A/N independent graphics cards.
In terms of comprehensive design, the relative advantages brought by heterogeneous CPUs in saving PCB area are not enough to offset the absolute gap in power consumption and performance between built-in GPUs and independent GPUs. The current Ryzen mobile processor integrating Vega GPU with 8 sets of CU units cannot completely leave the Intel Iris series core display far behind. A higher-level Ryzen mobile processor integrating 10 sets of CU units can complete tasks that are close to mainstream independent graphics in thin and light notebooks. However, if the power consumption bottleneck of the mounting platform cannot be resolved, the Ryzen 7 2700U GPU will also suffer a considerable performance loss. .
This means that thin and light notebooks dominated by AMD Ryzen mobile processors are still unable to independently run mainstream stand-alone large-scale games. The conservative power consumption design of its first products and the bottleneck factors of single-channel memory limit its built-in Vega Take advantage of GPU performance. Although it will take time for subsequent OEM platforms to deeply tune this series of processors, we still look forward to seeing the full-blooded version of the powerful full-body Ryzen processor shine in other molds in the future.
In terms of actual use
AMD’s graphics patents, driver perfection, external monitors, and professional software acceleration capabilities are not comparable to Intel core graphics cards, but AMD is in these aspects The practical accumulation requires more time to be immersed in the industry to fully exert its effect.
In terms of cost-effectiveness
AMD Ryzen mobile processor platform thin and light notebooks are currently very cost-effective. Compared with Intel mainstream GT2 core display notebooks, her battery life level is not much different, and the GPU performance Then crush it. Compared with the combined platform of Intel CPU and NVIDIA independent graphics, RyzenThe overall performance of mobile processor platforms is very close, and the absolute pricing is low, so the relative cost performance is much higher.
Conclusion:
Based on the current reality, the first Ryzen mobile processor platforms including Lenovo IdeaPad 720S and HP x360 are all high-performance, balanced and thin and light notebook molds positioned to be friendly to the people. , which is something the notebook world has never seen in many years. Whether from a technical or market perspective, AMD Ryzen APU will use strong energy to shake up and change the thin and light notebook market structure that has been controlled by Intel for many years in the near future.
The above is the performance of the AMD Ryzen R5 2500U processor I introduced. I hope it will be helpful to you.